Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US Navy 090711-N-9712C-007 ight F-A-18 Hornets assigned the River Rattlers, Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 204, fly in a column formation over southern Louisiana's wetlands during a photo exercise.jpg

File:US Navy 090711-N-9712C-007 ight F-A-18 Hornets assigned the River Rattlers, Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 204, fly in a column formation over southern Louisiana's wetlands during a photo exercise.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2010 at 23:22:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:US Navy 090711-N-9712C-007 ight F-A-18 Hornets assigned the River Rattlers, Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 204, fly in a column formation over southern Louisiana's wetlands during a photo exercise.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US Navy 090711-N-9712C-007 ight F-A-18 Hornets assigned the River Rattlers, Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 204, fly in a column formation over southern Louisiana's wetlands during a photo exercise.jpg

•  Info created by John P. Curtis (USAF) - uploaded by Multichill - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support 99of9 (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - This one shows also the terrain. Would prefer cropping away the top, but I think it is a FP anyway. --MattiPaavola (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ianaré (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

 Neutral Very nice image but I don't like the extra-long file name!! this make it hard to use images on other projects, also there is no more space for edit summary.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  15:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose due to excessively long filename. Sorry, mate, I told you... Wolf (talk) 17:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support well done photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very impressive. --Cayambe (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose What's on the picture is spectacular, but i'm not impressed by the picture itself. Sharpness, composition... Not bad, but no cigar. B.t.w. is the top plane wearing soviet markings? Kleuske (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
  •  Info Since the en:VFA-204 is part of the en:Tactical Support Wing, and not actually a front-line squadron, I assume the stars are left over from Aggressor training. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I thought something like that might be the case. I remembered Top Gun just a tad too late.Kleuske (talk) 14:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture but for goodness sakes please rename it. Cousin Kevin (talk) 03:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
  •  CommentI've submitted rename requests for all 4. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 06:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX  ^talk  07:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy to be FP, in my opinion... --Phyrexian (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles