Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 121.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 121.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2024 at 07:01:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Portrait of young woman from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Question Staged image; watered face, too much jewelry...? I see they ofer photo excursions for African womens. Then bunch of Western horde is making "pure Africa". Black back isnt helpfull here, where is Saharan desert. --Mile (talk) 08:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a portrait and therefore she posed. That's not water, which is rare, but rather sweat. Too much jewelry? well, that's the way this tribe dress, that's how it is. Regarding the other comments, I'd only take them seriosly if you were somebody who has experienced such a trip once (which is obviously not the case based on what you write). Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is posed, but still a good portrait, compared to what we already have. Yann (talk) 09:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment I do like the composition, but the image should mention artificial black background. Quite a lot of work needed to correct background errors around neck and earrings. See notes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
-
- Charlesjsharp, Basile Morin: there is no artificial background here. We used a black sheet, I just darkened it a bit so that it's uniform. --Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC) PD: Thanks for the notes, fill fix them this evening.
-
- Support nice composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann, I don't mind that it is staged. Correcting some of the background errors would improve the image further. Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait. Posed portraits are normal and totally fine; I don't understand the objection. I see a few hot pixels to the right of the yellow beads above her breasts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Gone, I had fixed it but the upload of the last version didn't work. Not it's there. Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very aesthetic portrait. Looks like a hotpixel on the belly, but could also be a piece of the necklace. Does the lady have a name?--Ermell (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yeah, I do see a red hot pixel on her belly, now that you mentioned it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hot pixel removed, thanks. Ermell, surely she has a name, but we had that afternoon dozens of models, I cannot tell you. On the other side, they don't know how old they are, there is no documentation of that, no calendars, nothing like that. Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hot pixel
- Support Interesting and excellent quality with a high level of detail. Scarification is particularly impressive -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, a dangerous beauty ideal, indeed. They all had a significant amount of scarification, but some of them much more than this one. Poco a poco (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan and Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 19:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women
