Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thousand feet.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Thousand feet.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2013 at 15:13:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Ondřej Žváček - uploaded by Ondřej Žváček - nominated by Peter23 -- Peter23 (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Peter23 (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane diskuse 18:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting subject but quality is not at FP level. An important part of the picture is overexposed affecting colors and causing some CA. In addition -my taste- a more vertical perspective would actually make it more spectacular. Poco a poco (talk) 22:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose -- This picture had me confused for a few seconds. (That's not a bad thing) I kept wanting to rotate is 90 degrees to the left thinking it was some kind of fence :) It is and interesting subject for sure. A more vertical shot would have been better, especially if it would show a bit more of the walkway on the bottom of the frame. --Uberprutser (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support rare and high quality. Alborzagros (talk) 06:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support Anyway a great shot. --Llorenzi (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Poco. Overall quality is just barely at QI threshold. --A.Savin 11:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support This is Wow!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Tomer T (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)