Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The School of Athens by Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino in Vatican Last.jpg

File:The School of Athens by Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino in Vatican Last.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2024 at 19:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The School of Athens by Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino in Vatican Last.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The School of Athens by Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino in Vatican Last.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Frescos and murals
•  Info created by Raffaello Sanzio - uploaded and nominated by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Impressive resolution, but we already have a FP version with different colors, so I wonder why this is much more blue. Yann (talk) 19:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

I was looking at other photos and comparing them with mine, I asked myself the same question and I have come to the conclusion that perhaps when they took the photo there was a type of lamp that emits yellow light giving that tone. Today it has been replaced by a fluorescent light that does not directly impact the painting. You could check the colors, this is definitely not yellowish.[1][2][3] --Wilfredor (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your third link is a copy from Commons, but we can trust the Vatican Museum. Yes, not yellow, but a little less blue than yours. Yann (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

No, you can't trust them, the quality of their photos are not good and I think the colors are modified. Making special mention of the photos of the Sistine Chapel of which it is not allowed to take photos but right after they sell their saturated and poorly taken photos Wilfredor (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I am seeing what I believe to be green and purplish CA at the pixel or a few pixel level interspersed all through the picture, and I don't see that in the FP Yann linked, so I'm reluctant to consider this an FP. I find it hard to believe that was part of the artist's palette. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

  I don't think so either, but after 500 years perhaps the colors underwent some modification. I could upload the raws if you don't believe me and need to see for yourself Wilfredor (talk) 23:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

• Sure, it's possible the colors changed, but why doesn't the other photo show those changes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

 Info That's not CA but chroma noise, and it's all over the image. El Grafo (talk) 09:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

I know there is noise due to the darkness of the place, but I generally don't do denoise on paintings because noise is information in these cases. When it comes to normal objects, noise removal works but, as in the case of Topaz AI, in paintings the software gets confused with the faces and tries to add non-existent details, so I have chosen not to remove the noise Wilfredor (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Alt chroma denoise version

•  Info It was difficult to remove the noise due to the dimensions of this image, I generally don't remove noise from paintings so I had to take the appropriate time to do a respectful job. The biggest problem was finding a computer that could handle such voluminous images. Please give it a new look. @El Grafo, Ikan Kekek, and Yann: . Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
• Please have another look. Some areas of the upper center are notably unsharp. I haven't checked the entire photograph, but it looks like some further editing is needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

  In that case I give up, it is a very big image and I need to borrow a computer that I don't have. Wilfredor (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 00:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)