Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Entombment of Christ-Caravaggio (c.1602-3).jpg

File:The Entombment of Christ-Caravaggio (c.1602-3).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2024 at 20:15:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Entombment of Christ-Caravaggio (c.1602-3).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Entombment of Christ-Caravaggio (c.1602-3).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
•  Info Caravaggio, The Entombment of Christ - uploaded by Masur - nominated by --Thi
•  Support --Thi (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 23:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Question Colleagues, how do we determine why one or another medieval painting might get status and another? The question is rhetorical, I have another favorite painting of this painter:) JukoFF (talk) 00:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

• Personally I will support if it is a work by a reasonably well-known artist (i.e. notable enough to make their work important) that has at least some aesthetic appeal to me and if the quality of the reproduction is good. In this case the painting has a Wikipedia article so its notability is clear. Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for the answer, but I'm not sure that the presence of a Wikipedia article should influence the choice, in the case of choosing other digital images the presence of a Wikipedia article in 9 cases out of 10 plays no role at all. Why does it matter in this case? JukoFF (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

• I mean it's not essential. For the artist to have a WP article is probably enough for me. I think our job re. artworks on Commons FP is to build a library of high-quality digitisations of artwork that might plausibly be considered great or valuable. Cmao20 (talk) 02:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

• I don't think our job re. artworks on Commons FP is to build a library of high-quality digitisations of artwork. I can't see the point. The version seems oversaturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

• What is it then? For me, this is exactly for Commons is here for. But I agree about the saturation. Yann (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak support – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)