Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Techumbre mudéjar, Catedral, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 38.JPG

File:Techumbre mudéjar, Catedral, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 38.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2014 at 18:26:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Techumbre mudéjar, Catedral, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 38.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Techumbre mudéjar, Catedral, Teruel, España, 2014-01-10, DD 38.JPG

•  Info Mudéjar decorated coffer ceiling of the nave of the Teruel Cathedral, Aragón, Spain. This unique piece belongs to the UNESCO Heritage site of the Mudéjar Architecture of Aragon and dates from the 14th century. It shows historical, religious, human and animal figures in Gothic style. All by me, Poco² 18:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 18:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Cut and need some sharpening but, Congrats, nice composition and perspective --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 19:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

  I uploaded a new version with a bit more sharpening (selective) Poco² 20:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

 Question Simplemente esplendida, mucho mejor ahora. Cuando hablas de enfoque selectivo te refieres a manual o automáticamente por filtro? --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

• En este caso manual, en la techumbre (el automático lo aplico siempre por defecto). Poco² 20:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Te ha quedado genial, muchos pasamos por alto la belleza de los techos. Espero que se animen a votar. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 02:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --JLPC (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC), although I'd have tried to darken a bit the stained glass on the right. --JLPC (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment The unintentional "non-centered" composition, and the subsequent unfortunate crop at left are a "no-go" for me. The whole picture is a bit too much softened (denoising ?), and therefore, the ceiling is not detailed/sharp enough. But I wont oppose because wow.--Jebulon (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)