Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tauroctony.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tauroctony.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2013 at 15:23:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Support Well-lit statue clearly showing all the elements of this mythical scene. -- Colin (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Neutral- Tripods and any "professional" equipment are not allowed without prior permission from management and certainly not during daylight hours -- the place is absolutely mobbed. You can see from my settings (f2.8, 1/30s and iso400) that the light level is very low. This image hasn't been downsampled, so I think the noise/resolution is fine at 100% -- it improves to excellent at 66% reduction which is still a bigger photo than many nominations and many times higher than the minimum criteria of 2MP. So I think expecting ISO 100 levels of noise and sharpness isn't realistic. -- Colin (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support Then for sure: Well done! I cannot understand such strict rules in museums. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tripods and any "professional" equipment are not allowed without prior permission from management and certainly not during daylight hours -- the place is absolutely mobbed. You can see from my settings (f2.8, 1/30s and iso400) that the light level is very low. This image hasn't been downsampled, so I think the noise/resolution is fine at 100% -- it improves to excellent at 66% reduction which is still a bigger photo than many nominations and many times higher than the minimum criteria of 2MP. So I think expecting ISO 100 levels of noise and sharpness isn't realistic. -- Colin (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 13:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Comment It lacks the bottom part of the sculpture, and the crop is very tight at the upper border.--Jebulon (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid there is nothing I can do about that now. If you have a few hundred quid spare, I'd be very happy to go back and have another go :-) -- Colin (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 21:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
