Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tallinna Raekoda 11-06-2013.jpg

File:Tallinna Raekoda 11-06-2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2013 at 19:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tallinna Raekoda 11-06-2013.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tallinna Raekoda 11-06-2013.jpg

•  Info Tallinn Town Hall, all by Ivar (talk) 19:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 19:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support very good. -- Felix König ✉ 20:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, but featurable ? --Jebulon (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image about the oldest town hall in the whole of the Baltic and Scandinavia. Definitely featurable. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Slightly cw tilt or distorted. --Laitche (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please add a note, where iyo is cw tilt/distortion. --Ivar (talk) 10:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

• The tower seems tilted clockwise for me. --Laitche (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
• Maybe it's optical illusion but seems slightly distorted central part of photo for me. --Laitche (talk) 11:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
• It looks good to me, however this is stitched image of very old building. --Ivar (talk) 12:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

• Maybe you are right. I added the note, especially that part seems strange. --Laitche (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
• That part is easy to prove. The house by the town hall has tilted walls. Diego has a photo from it and a single shot version of the Town Hall. --Ivar (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

• Okay I'm convinced. --Laitche (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support --JLPC (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -Pudelek (talk) 17:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Per the image itself, and convinced by Kruusamägi, thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Question It a nice motive and technically well done. If you take a look on Suncalc there are two possible recording times for the photo - VERY early in the morning, shortly after sunrise at 3.30 am [1] or shortly before sunset at 8.30pm (as you've choosen). The problem with the recording time in the evening is that most parts of your main motive are in shadow. Have you ever seen the lighting situation early in the morning and can you judge if it is better? Or are there other shortcomings in the morning? --Tuxyso (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice to see, that I'm not the only one, who calculates sun's position. Town Hall has this kind of evening light only some three weeks during whole year. Early morning light was my second choice, because if the sun shines from that side, the neighbor buildings and some of the Town Hall itself would have been in the shadow, whilst foreground would have more light. --Ivar (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the information. I think you did the best here - north fassades are quite unthankful :) --Tuxyso (talk) 08:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Arcalino (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I was going to vote neutral because although the top half is good, the market is in shadow. I encourage people to explain lighting difficulties/features in their nomination rather than leave reviewers to second-guess. -- Colin (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --V-wolf (talk) 17:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 20:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /JKadavoor Jee 03:42, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture