Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower from Silesia2.jpg

File:Sunflower from Silesia2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2009 at 08:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower from Silesia2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunflower from Silesia2.jpg

1513

1335

186

136

2434

1697

cloning error

1751

1329

119

85

2434

1697

cloning error

•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only recently we Featured File:Sunflower sky backdrop.jpg, which has better quality (image noise!) and arguably a better composition as well. -- JovanCormac 10:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
  • noise? I don't see... --Pudelek (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Look around the bottom right petals at full resolution. It's quite visible, actually. -- JovanCormac 11:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
      • if this picture was so small as this picture File:Sunflower sky backdrop.jpgthat would not be noise, but this is larger and more detailed --Pudelek (talk) 13:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The noise is insignificant, but there are noticeable editing errors around the petals where the other bits of the plant have been cloned out. --Tony Wills (talk) 07:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Fine photo but nothing special. Multimotyl (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)