Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spring April 2010-2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Spring April 2010-2.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2010 at 23:01:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Spring is here! Composition on yellows and purples: Coleostephum myconis (yellow) and Echium plantagineum (purple). This was a bit more difficult to do than it seems due to the need of a generous dof, the large dynamic range between the yellows (almost burned) and the purples (a bit dark) ... and the wind. Anyway that is not a criterium for promotion. Beauty is. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't really like the composition. There should be only one flower in focus in the rest should make a blurry background IMO. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- But that would be a different subject. This is basically like saying I don't really like the composition. There should be a fighter jet in focus and the background should be a fiery explosion. --Dschwen (talk) 01:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support for a well-executed shot of a natural situation. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support A sea of flowers with complementary colours in yellow and violet. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I get the visual appeal of the yellow next to the purple, but I don't get that's there's a clear educational quality to the image. If you simply mean showing the flowers, I don't think it's a very clear or evocative photo of either species. Compare to Alvesgaspar's FP nom above, File:Spring April 2010-3.jpg Steven Walling 20:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support, FP. JukoFF (talk) 16:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)