Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spathiphyllum-Flower.jpg

File:Spathiphyllum-Flower.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2013 at 09:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Spathiphyllum-Flower.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spathiphyllum-Flower.jpg

•  Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a nice flower and the image quality is also good, but i dont like the composition. The leafs on the left and the down right corner are distracting and i dont like the background colors. --mathias K 15:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

  I've expected that someone will oppose due to the background :) Especially the flower is shown in its "natural" enviornment - it is a room plant. The background comes from indoor light, a lilac wallpaper and a door frame. IMHO the leafs are not distracting, they are placed exactly there on puropse: I've choosen this composition very carefully and integrated the leafs as framing elemenst. I've used golden ratio for different elements of the flower. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Imo the leaves [sic] are easy to clone out, esp. the right-hand one. You should try to find a usage for the picture. --A.Savin 21:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

  As already written: The leaves are there on purpose. If one do not like the composition - it is OK (as mathias has already opposed). --Tuxyso (talk) 21:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)