Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skottehytta-070820.jpg

File:Skottehytta-070820.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Upior polnocy - uploaded by Upior polnocy - nominated by Przykuta --Przykuta (talk) 22:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Przykuta (talk) 22:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The atmosphere is very impressive, it attracts me somehow but I'm afraid that there's not much of the surroundings and it looks a bit cramped. As a pano or more wide-angled (with some more mountains and boundless expanse) it would be a burner. --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Could you add the location? —kallerna™ 12:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 17:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The background is beautiful with the mountains but the building looks old and somewhat dilapidated. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment That being the entire point of the photograph... Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 05:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • ??? --ianaré (talk) 06:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Well, it wouldn't be such a great photo if it was an average suburban office block, would it? The dilapidation of the house adds depth and emotion to the image. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
      •  Support In other words, an antiquity. --Ayacop (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Richard Bartz. —kallerna™ 12:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I tended more to support instead of oppose :-)) --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose due to composition. The mountain top is jutting over the roof and looking like it's part of it. I don't know if it's possible, but from a higher vantage point (ladder, car roof?) it would have been great. --Dori - Talk 03:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 22:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral: I like the picture, but I think that it would have been possible to take a much better photo of this subject, landscape, light and mood (less interference of cabin and background, more focus on how the cabin is situated in the landscape). --Siebengang (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose--Kuvaly (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Mywood (talk) 17:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)