Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 at Sydney Airport.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 at Sydney Airport.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2014 at 19:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Damien Aiello - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Description from photographer: Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 (9V-SKD) operating as SQ222 taking off in a southerly direction on Runway 16R at Sydney's Kingsford Smith Airport. Photo taken from a chopper flying parallel at approx 500ft. Focal length 200mm on F8 aperture. russavia (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- russavia (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Milad A380 talk? 20:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good light and detail level and well caught moment, but I do not like the tight crop of the tail to the left and the shadow to the right, sorry. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Nick (talk) 23:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry,per Slaunger,the I don't like the crop --LivioAndronico talk 07:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the crops are tight and 16:9 would probably give the subject more room to breathe, but it's excellent in every other way and I like the shadow very much. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 19:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment We could look at File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 woah!.jpg as see that although it is a fantastic photo, it is unlikely to be FP in its current state (ignoring the size issue) because it is "boxed in" in the frame. The analogous version of the photo being discussed here is to the right. Slaunger and LivioAndronico2013 have issues with the crop. The crop is fine IMHO for the purposes of FP -- the aircraft is not boxed in the frame, and has plenty of room to breathe. russavia (talk) 10:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the right and left crops. --Kadellar (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support The shadows in the nominated image gives highlight to the image showing hight above the ground etc. Josve05a (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Question What about a little "cheat", and adding some space left and right by cloning ? --Jebulon (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- I think it works. :) Jee 06:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Alternative version with more room[edit]
Info I don' t try to be deceptive. But please don't focus your review only on the retouched parts of the picture. Of course, you will probably find flaws (repeated patterns etc...) because it is a cloning. Remember instead: are you sure you will find (and search) the flaws if you did not know it is a retouched version ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 12:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Better, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 12:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yes, better. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Jee 13:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Now is perfect --LivioAndronico talk 13:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 13:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Nice edit, Jebulon! -- Slaunger (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Even the original one was great and this one also is better, thank you! −ebraminiotalk 16:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 17:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Much better, compositionally. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:45, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support well done improvement of an already very nice image. --P e z i (talk) 13:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles
The chosen alternative is: File:Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 at Sydney Airport room added.jpg