Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silver Gulls.jpg

File:Silver Gulls.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2011 at 12:09:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Silver Gulls.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silver Gulls.jpg

•  Info all by User:99of9 - 99of9 (talk) 12:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support as nom. -- 99of9 (talk) 12:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Maredentro
  • As a user of less than 50 edits and with an account age less then 10 days, you don´t have the right to vote.--Snaevar (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a nice topic, but the quality is a bit mediocre for a featured picture. Almost none of the legs (and there are many) show much detail. W.S. 07:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support: Nice image. TFCforever (talk) 04:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose about half of the segulls are blurry and lacking detail. IMO the only thing OK about this picture is the railing they are standing on.--Snaevar (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Neutral It's interesting, but I don't like how the camera seems to be far-sighted. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment-- mine! Downsampledbokeh (talk) 20:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 12:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:46, 29 January 2011 (UTC)