Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shuttleexternaltank.svg

File:Shuttleexternaltank.svg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2011 at 10:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Shuttleexternaltank.svg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shuttleexternaltank.svg

•  Info created by malyszk - uploaded by malyszkz - nominated by malyszkz -- Malyszkz (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Malyszkz (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Highly valuable and useful illustration. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I have seen better, but i know how much work it is to do a good illustration, compared to a good photography. --Niabot (talk) 21:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Still needs much more work, at least on the copyediting front. A few examples: "Macimum", "1.655,600", "Liquid Oxygen vent valve and Fairing" (mixed case). Fixes would get it to QI standard (although the ugly stats box might need to be removed), but IMO it's still not an FP. The drawing seems competent but not attention-grabbing. "No wow", in other words. --Avenue (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Avenue, many errors and the stats box is really ugly. The length dimensions could be integrated in the graph. Suggest withdrawing this, and getting it reviewed at QI and/or VI first. --ELEKHH^T 02:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Though I do like Avenue's idea about adding the dimensions to the labelled parts. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 01:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • That was Elekhh's idea, not mine. A good thought, I agree. --Avenue (talk) 11:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Avenue. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
• A few issues, but none serious enough for me to oppose the image. First of all an spelling error, "Lenght" (153.8 feet) should be Length. Secondly, for Wikipedia usability the text should be readable at 400px and that is achieved with a 20px font (or slightly larger, perhaps). Thirdly, the Arial font used in this image isn´t really supported by the renderer on wikimedia (including commons and wikipedia), Liberation Sans or others would be supported. A full list of supported fonts are located at m:SVG_fonts.--Snaevar (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral per the spelling error in the image mentioned above.--Snaevar (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Changes made to the file. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks IdLoveOne, but can the creator convert the units of measurement in meters? The world is not the USA. --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Almost there, the lbs. just need conversion to kgs. :) -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 04:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment There are still lots of spelling mistakes and other errors. E.g. "Anti slash Baffles" should be "Anti-slosh Baffles"; "Anti vortex Gaffles" should be "Anti-vortex Baffles"; "Alt" -> "Aft"; "Umbitical Plate" -> "Umbilical Plate"; "Feed" -> "Feed,". I think that the long thin bit along the upper edge of the liquid hydrogen tank is shown in NASA's original diagram as a cylinder (perhaps a pipe?), but in this SVG version it looks more featureless and definitely not cylindrical. I'm also concerned that the semitransparent cylinder at the back now showing the diameter measurement could be misinterpreted as part of the tank, at least at first glance. And for a PNG to SVG conversion, I think simply saying "Own work" in the Source section of the file description verges on plagiarism. The original should be acknowledged more directly than just an unexplained link in the Other Version section. The editor's conversion of the diagram to SVG should also be credited, of course. --Avenue (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)