Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serratula seoanei, Zaagblad 02.JPG

File:Serratula seoanei, Zaagblad 02.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2015 at 06:20:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Serratula seoanei, Zaagblad 02.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serratula seoanei, Zaagblad 02.JPG

8

444

2571

1583

3140

2512

Something like that could be a good option

955

435

1934

1583

3140

2512

Or this

•  Info Serratula seoanei, blade. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Brilliant. Even the smallest details are visible. -- Pofka (talk) 13:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Over-sharpened in my opinion - see the dark sharpening contours of the flower. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done Sharpness done something changed. --Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 20:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The picture could be more centralized. Only MHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)

• No at all... this could be even more to the right to better follow w:Rule of thirds or w:Golden ratio... -- RTA 05:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment A Tighter cut at the bottom could improve the picture (see the note suggestion), occupying more of the subject in the photo. Nice colours, a bit of blurred and lack of sharpness, but macro photo, so... and I had never heard about this lens before, it's good for you? -- RTA 05:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done Other crop.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment macro lens satisfies me fine.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
• Whatever, I  Support. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment @Famberhorst: I suggest you renominate it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)