Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwetzingen BW 2014-07-22 17-04-02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Schwetzingen BW 2014-07-22 17-04-02.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2014 at 10:46:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)- Support The image lacks detail but this is compensated by the great composition and colors, good job! Poco2 11:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support Guter Blick für eine ganz besondere Perspektive. Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu diesem gelungenen Foto! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Bottom part is very unsharp, cobblesones look washed. --Mile (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)- Support Tolle Komposition mit guter Nutzung wiederholter Elemente. Level of detail and sharpness is not very good, but with Poco. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The image lacks detail and this is not compensated by the great composition and colors. Tourists are disturbing. And per Mile. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose lacking quality/sharpness is not acceptable for a FP, particularly for such more or less easy objects --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Arcalino (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support Maybe focus should have been on the first arch to avoid the unfocused cobblestones on the foreground, but I think it is good enough as it is. --Kadellar (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per above -- Jiel (talk</99span>) 21:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose, it lacks clarity and sharpness imo, and I don't find the subject to be too striking. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support Soft, but I like it a lot --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 08:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose die Bildqualität ist nicht OK, leider zu unscharf. Ansonsten ein tolles Bild! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Huge wow and great composition. Unfortunately, it cannot quite mitigate for the rather poor image quality in my opinion. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- weak Support - soft, but great composition --Pudelek (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Beautiful though a bit soft. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
