Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schulensee Ostteil.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Schulensee Ostteil.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2020 at 17:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info all by me. Of course, taken with an iPhone and a bit spontaneously, but I love this picture. Hopefully your reviews could dissuade me from it 😉. Habitator terrae 🌍 17:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Trees on the right and some of the water is/are extremely unsharp, composition OK but not outstanding. Why do you think this is one of the finest pictures on the site? It's a good idea to submit to COM:QIC and/or COM:Photography critiques first. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Very unsharp. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Question really to unsharp for this resolution (4.032×3.024), so this doesn't match the guidelines??? Habitator terrae 🌍 00:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- The trees on the right in your photo are very blurry. The first one you linked I would say is very marginal and represents our bare minimum on technical quality (and is definitely sharper than yours). The second one was promoted back in 2008 and clearly doesn't meet our modern standards; I will nominate it for delisting. The third one is not very big, but we do give night shots a tiny bit more leeway as they are harder to capture with the full detail of a day shot (though not to the extent of the second one). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Strong oppose Nearly everything within the frame is blurry – in the typical way of phone cameras, whose tiny sensors have to strongly reduce noise at the expense of useful resolution (a highly resoluted blur is not useful), and even more so in low-light situations. Please have a look of FPs of the same resolution at 100 percent view to get an idea what kind of detail sharpness is expected here on an outstanding pic. Further, the crop is poor (especially the cut-off object on the lower right). Sorry if my wording sounds rude, no personal offense intended. Pity you didn’t have a better camera with you to capture this beautiful scene :) --Kreuzschnabel 07:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
