Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG

File:Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2016 at 04:37:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created and uploaded by User:Poco a poco - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I just find this such an unusual and strange image, with the people and SUV in the middle of nowhere at the break of dawn in a completely empty salt flat with a cloudless sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 05:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted, compo is not so interesting. --Mile (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Technically good, except for the tilt, but it looks more like a car ad than an FP to me. cart-Talk 08:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

• A great car ad could be a FP. Why not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

• Yes it can, if it's great, but this composition is lacking. Something a simple a kneeling would have made this photo better, then the car and the persons would have "risen" and all cut through the horizon. Like in this very crude photoshoped version of the pic: . Now they look kind of "submerged". Shooting towards a horizon, I always get my knees dirty, many times it increases the wow factor. I always think of Jean Giraud's work when I see Poco's flat lands since Giraud got much of his inspiration from places like this and he often uses the low horizon to draw dramatic scenes. cart-Talk 09:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of composition, subject and technical merit. There's a person moving through the shot among other weaknesses. Charles (talk) 09:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I'd give it a pro if it wasn't that tilted. Would surely be better if there wasn't the moving person visible. I don't really see why it should have been necessary to use HDR here. --Code (talk) 12:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Reminds me this. Jee 12:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
• User:Poco a poco, I hope it wasn't inappropriate for me to nominate this photo. If you'd like to edit it to address the criticisms that have been made above, please go ahead and then ping everyone (or I could ping everyone). If you would prefer to withdraw the nomination, do that. I like this photo a lot, but I understand the criticisms. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

  Hello Ikan! Thank you very much for this unexpected nom. I can address the mentioned issues but to do so I need access to this raw files and I don't have it right now (nor in the next weeks). Can you withdraw the nomination? I will work on the file when I am back from my trip. Sorry, the timing is just pretty bad for me. Poco² 18:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Charles plus man in the center has glaring head and double contour. --Ivar (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
• Very nice idea which I wanted to support on first glance but then, regretful  Oppose for poor craftmanship. Double contours on standing man and car roof baggage, chromatic aberration on the car wheels, blurred person, horizon leaning to the right. This might be one of our nicest pictures but it’s surely not one of our best ones. Sorry for putting it so harshly. --Kreuzschnabel 15:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination - Thanks for your votes and comments. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 00:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)