Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts-9318.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts-9318.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg - uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Kreuzschnabel 08:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Support For moderate wow factor IMHO Poco2 10:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Neutral the person with the lamp hat ruins the composition --Wilfredor (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Frank, I'm seeing pixel-level fabric-like textures on things I wouldn't expect to have a texture, such as the pillars. The green wall looks quite blocky and posterised. I wonder if perhaps you have overcooked this one. The lamp-hat is indeed unfortunate. Do you have a frame without it, or that could be used to clone/fix that area? -- Colin (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Hey Colin, I apologize for not getting back to you earlier. I took the photo as part of the Culture Crawl event during WikiConference North America on Friday. The conference ended today and I honestly didn't have much time taking care of this. I'll fly home from Boston to San Francisco tomorrow and take a closer look. Hopefully, I'll be able to fix the issues that you addressed. Thanks a lot for your feedback, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)--Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not that wowed--Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Boothsift on this one; the wow factor is not there for me. --Peulle (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The wow is subtle but it's there for me; however I oppose because per Colin I'm not convinced by the image quality. There's some odd banded textures here and there, and the image as a whole gives the impression of being slightly unsharp and oversharpened to compensate, if that makes sense. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Colin, a pity. --A.Savin 19:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Boothsift. —kallerna (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination After coming back from the conference and taking a closer look, I agree with the opposers. The image quality isn't good enough and the wow factor on the lower end compared to some of my other work. So, I withdraw. Thanks a lot for the feedback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
