Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Punta de flecha del neolítico, frontera de Níger y Mali, 2021-01-15, DD 244-293 FS.jpg

File:Punta de flecha del neolítico, frontera de Níger y Mali, 2021-01-15, DD 244-293 FS.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2021 at 12:46:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Punta de flecha del neolítico, frontera de Níger y Mali, 2021-01-15, DD 244-293 FS.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Punta de flecha del neolítico, frontera de Níger y Mali, 2021-01-15, DD 244-293 FS.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Others
•  Info Focus stacked image (composed of 50 frames) of a well elaborated arrowhead from the Neolithic, final division of the Stone Age and therefore between 6,5 and 4 thousand years old. The 4.7 centimetres (1.9 in)-long arrowhead is made of flint and was found in the border between Niger and Mali. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Impressive for the size of the object, but since you give us such generous resolution, would it be worth trying to sharpen the photo a bit more? This arrowhead shows really good workmanship. Don't you meant it's made out of flint? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

  I've applied some more sharpening Ikan Kekek, wouldn't go further than that. I didn't understand your second question, is the workmanship too good for flint? --Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment You say it's made out of "filt". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Very slight improvement that's visible to me only at full size. I'm not sure. This definitely should be a QI, though, and it would probably be a good VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Ikan Kekek you see FP potential here? I can redo it and hopefully get more sharpness. And, yes, sorry, I meant flint, I've corrected it. Poco a poco (talk) 11:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment It's a beautiful arrowhead, so yes, I see FP potential with increased sharpness and other changes that would make it comparable to what you did with the fossil. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

• So, Ikan Kekek, ...and this was what I tried in the evening. Unfortunately it didn't work so good as I expected. Will try it somewhen soon with a new version from scratch, for now I take it back.  I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC))