Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente Arslanagić, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 28.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Puente Arslanagić, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 28.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2014 at 19:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info The Arslanagić Bridge is a 80 m long and 6 m high Ottoman bridge built originally in 1574 by order of the Grand Vizier Sokollu Mehmed Pasha, and rebuilt in 1972 in the city of Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The bridge was an important trading link over the Trebišnjica river between Novi (today Herceg Novi in Montenegro) and Ragusa (today Dubrovnik in Croatia). All by me, Poco2 19:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 19:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)- Support --A.Savin 19:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support wow, cool! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Love the reflection. The big green patch on the left isn't adding much but I can't see how to eliminated it from this particular viewpoint. The fact that the top of the mountains are hidden behind the bridge isn't ideal (compare File:Puente Arslanagić, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 29.jpg, which sadly doesn't have such good reflections). Am I the only person who, when first looking at this image, "saw" horrendous stitching "errors" -- like the top of the bridge was really badly stitched to the bottom. -- Colin (talk) 21:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- I cannot see anything, but for sure there are no stitching errors because this picture is the result of one single frame Poco2 07:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Poco, as Saffron makes clear, it is an illusion -- that's why I put "saw" and "errors" in quotes. Sorry if it didn't translate. -- Colin (talk) 07:46, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support That second arch lends to the stitching error illusion in the thumb. At full res it's gone and the view is even more impressive. Saffron Blaze (talk) 04:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support (Note: Coordinates are missing.)--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 05:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Uoaei1 (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:46, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Weak support Great picture and viewpoint. But I personally feel that the mountains were ended quite abruptly by the bridge, hence the "weak". --Graphium 09:03, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Overall very high quality an great composition, i don't mind the mountains behind the bridge.--ArildV (talk) 09:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support The bridge could be sharper, but overall good quality and very good composition. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Wish it was a bit sharper but it's well worthy of support anyway. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 23:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support As others have said, wish it was a little bit sharper, but great image!--Godot13 (talk) 06:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment -- As Colin, I love the reflection. But the composition seems somehow unnatural to me (distortion is perhaps one the cause) and image quality is just regular (too agressive jpeg compressure?) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Very good, and the reflection is very nice. The distortion is a bit disturbing. Sorry if I am alone to dare to oppose due to the lack of sharpness, which is not sufficient for a FP in my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)- Support · Favalli ⟡ 01:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 10:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --AmaryllisGardener talk 19:05, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges
