Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prichsenstadt BW 2011-06-28 17-29-01.JPG

File:Prichsenstadt BW 2011-06-28 17-29-01.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2011 at 15:15:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Prichsenstadt BW 2011-06-28 17-29-01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prichsenstadt BW 2011-06-28 17-29-01.JPG

•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support The shot is very nice. Love the colors, the lighting and the architecture. It looks like a very peaceful place. Good EV, little noise, no halo effect, good saturation and composition (like the angle). Don't give full support because there is a little bit of CA (e.g. chimney on the left), and mostly because some points lack sharpness. Maybe a higher f and slower speed would have been better. Crop is too large on the right too, imo (why keep the disturbing signs?), but that's ok. -- Paolo (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the hints. I tried to correct the issues. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
    •  Support For the correction. Paolo (talk) 18:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Also ich hab an der Schärfe überhaupt nichts zu kritisieren, die kleineren CAs sind spürbar, stören aber so gut wie gar nicht. Mir wiederum gefällt die Perspektive nicht besonders, denn von der Durchfahrt könnte man mehr sehen, doch diese ist durch eine schattige und damit mMn schon allein störende Mauer verdeckt. Der Heckenansatz rechts gefällt mir ebenfalls nicht besonders. Hast du von diesem jedoch sehr schönen Motiv noch andere Bilder gemacht, von anderen Standpunkten? Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, there is another view of that gate: File:Prichsenstadt BW 2011-06-28 17-28-19.JPG --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
    • ok, this candidate is better;  Weak support, but I still don't like the shady wall ;) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:08, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Galandil (talk) 21:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I could not find a real CA, and the sharpness is also acceptable. Mir gefällt die Perspektive sehr gut, da sie Tiefe ins Bild bringt. Wenn beide Türme bei einer Frontalaufnahme gleich groß wären, würde das Bild langweilig werden. --Ritchyblack (talk) 04:40, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the description should be improved. -- ThiagoRuiz ^talk 17:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good image, but nothind so special for FP. --Karelj (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above - Benh (talk) 08:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)