Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo December 2013-12a.jpg

File:Porto Covo December 2013-12a.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2014 at 21:35:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo December 2013-12a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo December 2013-12a.jpg

•  Info I have been chasing this subject for years, with mixed results: here, here and here. This time I believe the conditions were unique, with the stormy sea all white and the foam, illuminated by the setting sun, dripping down the dark rocks. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment That's good. Really! But I just wanted to ask that first: if there are 2 very similar FP images, where 1 seems better, then should the other be delisted? Kruusamägi (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Info -- We don't have a specific policy on this. Everything is analyzed on a case by case basis. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Well, anyway I prefer this image to the other. Kruusamägi (talk) 14:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment I personally prefer File:Porto_Covo_January_2011-2b.jpg. The light there is warmer, the sky and composition more interesting. On your current nomination the foam from the water has a relatively strong blue cast in the shadow parts. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info -- I have slightly decreased the blue cast. However that was the light at the place just before sunset. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
    • Defintely better than before. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer this one actually, because there's a more pronounced effect of the waves crashing on the shore. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

• I change to  Neutral --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Neutral I prefer the other photo, mainly due to a more interesting sky. In comparison, that is just missing here. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose As long as there is an almost identical photo of the same user already featured:
•  Comment Please give us the choice to select between both images. There is no need to have both images featured. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
• Sorry Norbert, but I don't accept. There are several duplicate FP with the same subject, and the lighting and colors of the two pictures are different. But you really don't need me to make a choice. Supposing that this picture is promoted (which is far from guaranteed), the other one can always be nominated for delisting, invoking that it is identical to the present one. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

• Now we have a {{Delistandreplace}} for identical images from same authors. So better try that. The documentation also should be amended to include this. Currently it is "It is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images." Jee 03:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose for now. Jee 03:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support /St1995 12:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Jee 04:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)