Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portal da Catedral de La Seu d'Urgell.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Portal da Catedral de La Seu d'Urgell.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2014 at 16:45:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Portal of the Cathedral of la Seu d'Urgell. Catalonia. Spain. Created and uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment In the FPC talk page Jee quoted the opinion of the jurist Heta Pandit in last year's Wiki Loves Monuments: "I would have also liked to see some more human element. The relationship between monuments, nature and people is so important. ... A lot of the pictures were like tourist brochures.". He inspired me this nomination. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)- Support --P e z i (talk) 19:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Those people giving me a "going out of frame" feel; but interesting, overall. Jee 02:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Heta Pandit, and I like this one. Yann (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --EveryPicture (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I just see disturbing people in a normal quality picture. Nothing extraordinary, not a FP.--Jebulon (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2014 (UTC)- Oppose per Jebulon. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose -- per Jebulon. Sanyambahga (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose -- as Jebulon Moros y Cristianos 18:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC).
- Oppose per Jebulon. --mathias K 04:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment español: Comprendo que la gente estorbe cuando hay caos. No comprendo que la presencia de seres humanos en una disposición que estimo ordenada pueda ser disruptiva delante de un pórtico realizado por seres humanos. En este caso, al revés, considero que es interesante. Pero solamente es mi opinión y no deseo votar aunque lo de "normal quality picture" me parece casi insultante. Estoy harto de discutir!--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 01:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Luis Miguel, you must accept comments, even negative ! "normal quality picture" is NOT quasi insulting, even if you feel it is. If you think so, it will be hard to discuss, and to assess pictures here ! How could I say that I think it is not a FP ? Subsequently, do I have the simple right to give my opinion and to oppose ? This is a strong and not acceptable psychological pressure !--Jebulon (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry Jebulon, a normal quality is not a QI. What you want to say with "normal" (The question is irrelevant IMO: You do not have to answer)---Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- But I don't have problem, I think that the image can't be FP, but the problem of the image is not IMO "normal quality"--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I can't say the problem of the image in English. If you want, I can say it in Spanish, but I think that it's irrelevant--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I do not want to waste time with this discussion, but do not feel uncomfortable with me--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I do not want to waste time with this discussion, but do not feel uncomfortable with me--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I can't say the problem of the image in English. If you want, I can say it in Spanish, but I think that it's irrelevant--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- But I don't have problem, I think that the image can't be FP, but the problem of the image is not IMO "normal quality"--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry Jebulon, a normal quality is not a QI. What you want to say with "normal" (The question is irrelevant IMO: You do not have to answer)---Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 18:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Luis Miguel, you must accept comments, even negative ! "normal quality picture" is NOT quasi insulting, even if you feel it is. If you think so, it will be hard to discuss, and to assess pictures here ! How could I say that I think it is not a FP ? Subsequently, do I have the simple right to give my opinion and to oppose ? This is a strong and not acceptable psychological pressure !--Jebulon (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
