Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pops Restaurant, Route 66, Arcadia, Oklahoma, 04404a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pops Restaurant, Route 66, Arcadia, Oklahoma, 04404a.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2015 at 21:49:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, uploaded and nominated by -- Yann (talk) 21:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Support I like the composition and the colors. -- Yann (talk) 21:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Several dust spots, noisy and IMO too unsharp. --XRay talk 07:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)- Oppose per XRay. --Laitche (talk) 10:04, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Laitche: Same as above. Looking at it at 6 Mpx (3000 x 2000), it looks quite OK. At least not worse than your own picture with a similar resolution... I will correct the dust spots. Yann (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann: Even this zise (3000 x 1888) this photo is not sharp and noisy and distorted. I think importance of resolution is depend on the subject :) --Laitche (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, I think it looks bad even at even smaller resolutions than 6 megapixels. The top 'straw' is obviously very out of focus and the rest is soft too. It's a great subject and great composition but I'm surprised that a photographer of her supposed calibre released such a technically poor image. Diliff (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Yann: Even this zise (3000 x 1888) this photo is not sharp and noisy and distorted. I think importance of resolution is depend on the subject :) --Laitche (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Laitche: Same as above. Looking at it at 6 Mpx (3000 x 2000), it looks quite OK. At least not worse than your own picture with a similar resolution... I will correct the dust spots. Yann (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Even if Mrs Highsmith is obviously a "sacred cow", I'm afraid this pic is far from our FP standards here, per Xray arguments. A pity, it looks appealing as thumbnail.--Jebulon (talk) 12:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose As other. --Mile (talk) 13:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed. Yann (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Yann, indeed it is fixed now
. -- Slaunger (talk) 14:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Yann, indeed it is fixed now
- Fixed. Yann (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. -- Pofka (talk) 19:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Well, no more chance, a lot of opposers...--Jebulon (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
