Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 20:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/image:Ponte Vecchio at dusk 1.JPGCommons:Featured picture candidates/image:Ponte Vecchio at dusk 1.JPG
Oppose per Kleuske. Although not perfect (clipped whites beyond what is unavoidable), the Quality is sufficient imo, but the crop on the left doesn't work well enough for FP imo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I think a wider view would work much better. The left side is cut of way to early and it would be nice to see the whole bridge on the left side. --mathiasK09:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info: Reverted to original version! Mathias - I guess you're right. Personally I like my original image a bit better, even though there might be some disturbing elements on the left side. So I'll keep giving it a shot with this one. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
True, a two segment panorama could have helped - maybe. It's difficult, though, to find a really perfect spot for taking pictures of the bridge from this side of the river. Just have a look at Street View using the image's geo reference... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I see the points about the grass at the left, but I think that it follows the border of the image in a nice enough way, to not really do anything negative. --heb [TCE] 14:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weakOppose Quality ok but not at highest level (see right side), but specially the crop is spoiling it. To me it is something in the middle of the way between a detail and an overview picture. You can make something better out of it Poco219:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm open to suggestions. Maybe a crop like this - focusing on details of the scenery and also paying more attention to 'formalities' like the rule of thirds would be better. Detail of Ponte Vecchio at dusk I'm better not going to offer this as an alternative though, considering there are only a couple of hours left in this voting period - and also because this image would be a major variation of the original nomination. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Oppose -- Unfortunate crop. Better images are available. Kleuske (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Info: New version! I've cropped the left side of the image, removing the remaining grass on the river's bank. Is it ok now? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Comment I'm open to suggestions. Maybe a crop like this - focusing on details of the scenery and also paying more attention to 'formalities' like the rule of thirds would be better. 
