Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 11092017 0785.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 11092017 0785.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2017 at 06:30:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
I withdraw my nomination created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose We have three FPs of this water slide, all taken by you:
- While the lighting/sky is different in this one, I don't think it is at the level of those. For example, the first one above has the slide in dark like this, but has a lovely soft background and good reflection in the water. Here the subject is quite small in the frame as a result of the wide-angle lens. There is a lot of clutter to the right and left. The water reflection isn't as good and the foreground water not adding anything. The water also appears to have either chroma noise or colour moire. -- Colin (talk) 07:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination I did not know it was not within the guidelines to nominate more than three images of one subject. Sorry! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Johann, it isn't against the guidelines at all. There is no rule like that. We're just judging "among our finest". You've set the bar for this subject, and I don't think this image approaches it. Others may disagree! -- Colin (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Colin The subject doesn`t allow a wide angle shot with all the clutter on the left. You are right. And your other arguments match as well. I see the "mistakes" I made, that`s why I withdrew. I think, it is the better way than to keep it nominated. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Johann, it isn't against the guidelines at all. There is no rule like that. We're just judging "among our finest". You've set the bar for this subject, and I don't think this image approaches it. Others may disagree! -- Colin (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
