Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Platbuf.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Platbuf.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2010 at 22:44:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me, -- Jebulon (talk) 22:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Neutral -- Jebulon (talk) 22:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Info this pic shows a part of an historical tree, a Platanus orientalis planted by the famous french naturalist Buffon in 1785 in the jardin des plantes of Paris. --Jebulon (talk) 22:49, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Support Very good! --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Distracting background. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Comment I'm respectfully sorry, but it is NOT a background, because all the image shows the same tree. If you are "distracted", you are distracted by the object of the pic. I'm not sure I'm clear...--Jebulon (talk) 09:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background indeed. Here the subject is not the whole tree (or else it is very badly depicted!), it is a few leaves and the fruit (flowers? whatever), and they are not isolated enough in the picture. --Eusebius (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral I disagree regarding the "distracting background" argument: the subject is the tree, and the composition is well balanced, with a pleasant colour scheme. Is certainly QI and VI, but is just not quite FP in terms of strenght of composition (focus/out-of-focus ratio too low IMO). --Elekhh (talk) 00:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- There is a world, outside this page... This image is already a QI, and part of a VI set...--Jebulon (talk) 10:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Composition and image quality (sharpness, lighting) are way below FP standards. The two fruits, which seem to be part of the central subject, are not sharp and well lightened. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
