Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pico Humboldt Venezuela cut.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pico Humboldt Venezuela cut.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2012 at 19:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Humboldt peak, 4,940 metres above sea level, To get there, it took five days of walking in places without civilization. All by -- The Photographer (talk) 19:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 19:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Question Why have you downsampled the previous version so dramatically? I think it is a pity. There is more information in the revision before this one. Although the downsampling gives you a better pixel-by-pixel quality, you also loose many pixels, and thus information. --Slaunger (talk) 21:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not too many important data in the other version, the other version is basically a stretched version and noisy. If you think you can do better, I invite you. I consider that to be a disposable camera, she has done quite well --The Photographer (talk) 22:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Oppose -- For me there is nothing feature-worthy in this photo. There is nothing special about the composition, it shows a very small and ambiguous portion of the subject and the file size lacks much detail.Fotoriety (talk) 23:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)- Oppose per Fotoriety, composition and subject do not convince me much. I'm sorry --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support I don't agree, I find it an impressive and engaging photograph. Tomer T (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Support A bit unsharp, but feature-worthy to me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support Cool! Michael Barera (talk) 03:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Comment When I first saw the image on VIC page, it was annotated that the man in red dress is The Photographer himself and now the annotation is deleted (file history can be checked). If the original file from which this derivative work came is checked, that file is still annotated that the man in red dress is The Photographer himself. If that is the case, then The Photographer is not the author, is he? This is not QIC, so the nomination is valid, but should the author name not change (and who is the author?)? It can be taken with a tripod and self-shutter, but is it the ideal condition for doing that? I'm not attacking or hounding anyone but I noticed the file annotations and these questions came to my mind. -- JDP90 (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Some photographs can not be taken directly as in the case of HDR, long exposure. In this case, I took myself to set the distance between one person and another. Any camera has this feature and it is easy to find. I had to carry a small tripod and a considerably larger luggage. Thanks for your comment --The Photographer (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't need a tutorial on self-timer. I've already mentioned it in my previous comment.--JDP90 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- I invite you to show off self-restraint and Assume good fait --The Photographer (talk) 11:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't need a tutorial on self-timer. I've already mentioned it in my previous comment.--JDP90 (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Some photographs can not be taken directly as in the case of HDR, long exposure. In this case, I took myself to set the distance between one person and another. Any camera has this feature and it is easy to find. I had to carry a small tripod and a considerably larger luggage. Thanks for your comment --The Photographer (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per opposes above. --Pine✉ 18:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
