Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Perth CBD - Kings Park.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Perth CBD - Kings Park.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 05:13:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Khr0n0s -- 27.33.185.222 05:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Support- Support: Very impressive. Great editing, amazing light, great resolution, definitely excellent. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere --Citron (talk) 09:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support--David1010 05:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support A bit of a surreal feeling, especially viewed at large size. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 07:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Paris 16 (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Oppose It's very nice, but something looks wrong about the tones. It's too bright maybe, and I see haloing on the thumbnail. - Benh (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)- Oppose Per Benh. Looking at the intersection/cloverleaf in the centre of the image, i very much get the impression that it's la nuit americaine in reverse. The city was much darker than this image suggests. This is actually a very overexposed night-shot trying to be a day shot. Kleuske (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose As Benh. --Karelj (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Benh and Kleuske. -- JDP90 (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support For the novelness of it. I would like it if the author didn't push the HDR quite so much (haloing, strange tones, etc), but then I guess it wouldn't be novel. Badon (talk) 08:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Partly a very good and interesting photo, but the overexposed parts around the intersection ruin the picture for me. -- Achird (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
