Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parco Sempione - Milano, 2023.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Parco Sempione - Milano, 2023.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2024 at 21:55:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
Info Parco Sempione is a huge green area built in 1893, imitating the style of English gardens. Having lived in London, I was thrilled to see something similar in Milan, an industrial city in Northern Italy. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Definitely very English, I thought it was going to be one of the London parks at first. But I'm unsure whether the light or the fairly featureless sky are sufficient for FP, even though the image quality is good Cmao20 (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment, it is important because I created the img from raw with the canon software using a neutral parameter. That’s why it is dark… So, I believe to re-rum the process as soon as possible. Terragio67 (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, not special enough in my view. Flat midday light, bland colors, unremarkable sky. It looks like a tourist shot, more than one of the best pictures of the website -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- yes..., I was working on it...
- I uploaded a new version just 1 minute after your review,
- Please delete your cache, to see the last one, thx. Terragio67 (talk) 01:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- You lifted the shadows and modified the brightness, but at the beginning it was early afternoon (3 pm) when the light is harsh. It's not a question of post-processing, in my opinion. The original colors and light were every average. Perhaps a neutral-density filter would have helped in these conditions. Unfortunately the nature and sky don't pop up. Also the foreground is out of focus (slightly blurry) and there are cars in the background. For me it's a quality image of an ordinary park. You see the orientation of the shadows, the direction of the sun was not the most cooperative -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 and Basile Morin, thank you very much for your useful comments, I'll treasure them.
I withdraw my nomination Terragio67 (talk) 14:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 and Basile Morin, thank you very much for your useful comments, I'll treasure them.
- You lifted the shadows and modified the brightness, but at the beginning it was early afternoon (3 pm) when the light is harsh. It's not a question of post-processing, in my opinion. The original colors and light were every average. Perhaps a neutral-density filter would have helped in these conditions. Unfortunately the nature and sky don't pop up. Also the foreground is out of focus (slightly blurry) and there are cars in the background. For me it's a quality image of an ordinary park. You see the orientation of the shadows, the direction of the sun was not the most cooperative -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
