Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramica da Rampa do Vale do Pati.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panoramica da Rampa do Vale do Pati.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2014 at 19:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created and uploaded by Carlos Perez Couto - nominated by Arion -- 
ArionEstar (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Support -- ArionEstar (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)- Support -- I would like the photo to be sharper still, especially at long distances, but I like the composition and my feeling is it is a successful photo. Ariadacapo (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Oppose It's a beautiful landscape and a good shooting position. But IMHO post-processing it not good here. The sky looks oversaturated and the clarity (micro-contrast) is overdone and there are too many very dark areas. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: It's fixable? ArionEstar (talk) 13:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar it might be fixable, but I think only in RAW. If you can provide the single RAW shots I can try to stitch a better version. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: How so single RAW shots? ArionEstar (talk) 15:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: If you take a look on the resolution (7,139 × 2,320 pixels) it can never be a single shot. According to the EXIF data the images come from a Nikon D90 with a 12 Mpx sensor. Thus you need multiple RAW files to stitch such a pano. The image editing (processing of RAW files, contract corrections etc.) is overdone here. So I think the best idea is to take the RAW files, develop them in a reasonable way and stitch a new panoramic photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: Then this will be spoken to the author of the photo, and he does not seem to be very active on Commons. ArionEstar (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: Then this will be spoken to the author of the photo, and he does not seem to be very active on Commons.
- @ArionEstar: If you take a look on the resolution (7,139 × 2,320 pixels) it can never be a single shot. According to the EXIF data the images come from a Nikon D90 with a 12 Mpx sensor. Thus you need multiple RAW files to stitch such a pano. The image editing (processing of RAW files, contract corrections etc.) is overdone here. So I think the best idea is to take the RAW files, develop them in a reasonable way and stitch a new panoramic photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: How so single RAW shots?
- @ArionEstar it might be fixable, but I think only in RAW. If you can provide the single RAW shots I can try to stitch a better version. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Tuxyso: It's fixable?
I withdraw my nomination ArionEstar (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
