Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Arlington National Cemetery - Section 54.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panorama of Arlington National Cemetery - Section 54.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 11:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
- Comment This image seems tilted but it is not. The cemetery is located in a hilly area. --Jovian Eye storm 11:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Jovian Eye storm 11:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment we've such cemeteries here in Germany, too - interesting photo motives :-) But the lighting on your pic is very bad. A great many of the gravestones are blown out and lost completely details, and at some parts crossings between the stones are missing (see annotations for some parts that should illustrate it). So imho not featured. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Let me see if I can fix it from the RAW today evening. --Jovian Eye storm 14:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure that won't be easy, so good luck! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done First of all, I checked the camera for highlights and there are none (Nothing blinks!). It is just that some of gravestones are facing the sun. Even if the sun were at zenith I guess some gravestones would still be white. --Jovian Eye storm 01:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure that won't be easy, so good luck! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Let me see if I can fix it from the RAW today evening. --Jovian Eye storm 14:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Ggia (talk) 09:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'm a freak of symmetry and minimalism. But this composotion is too booring, sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support All the detail I needed was there. Nice symmetry, I don't think it's boring. --99of9 (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Boring, but perfect. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 05:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Even if it's not really tilted it looks like it is, which ruins the composition to me. --Lošmi (talk) 22:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- That doesn't seem very fair. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 17:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I'm not fair. But the composition which tends to look symmetrical, and appears not to be doesn't convince me. If I choose this angle, I'd rather cut the image in the way that graveyards make a horizontal line parallel with frame. My opinion, only. --Lošmi (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're right, it is "tilted", thouggh that could be from a natural elevation. note. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 10:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I'm not fair. But the composition which tends to look symmetrical, and appears not to be doesn't convince me. If I choose this angle, I'd rather cut the image in the way that graveyards make a horizontal line parallel with frame. My opinion, only. --Lošmi (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- That doesn't seem very fair. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 17:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- OpposeNot only Lošmi's opinion I'm afraid. My opinion too.--Jebulon (talk) 14:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm afraid I agree with Lošmi and Jebulon: the horizon is not level and it throws the composition off for me enough that I have to vote in opposition. Also, although the 2nd version is better than the original upload, it could use a bit more to bring out the detail in the gravestones more. Nice effort, Joe. Earthsound (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)