Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panopea generosa.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Panopea generosa.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 15:01:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)- Support -- Snigger. 46.227.232.100 19:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Non valid vote. Please log in to vote, thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 23:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Good catch • Richard • [®] • 18:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Snigger Kleuske (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Oppose man's face is too blurry. Tomer T (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment If that were me I would wish for it to be even more so! Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment lol!! Yes, but I needed a human to get the scale!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- The subject is the clam, not the guy. I would hate it if that smirk weren't in the image, though. Kleuske (talk) 22:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- But, if that clam do spray like this? :) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- 100% real... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think consent is implicit if not explicit, but is he aware this will be all over the internet? On the lighter side, I am inclined to bring up Convergent evolution but that may be a stretch.131.137.245.206 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes he is... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think consent is implicit if not explicit, but is he aware this will be all over the internet? On the lighter side, I am inclined to bring up Convergent evolution but that may be a stretch.131.137.245.206 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- 100% real... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- But, if that clam do spray like this? :) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- The subject is the clam, not the guy. I would hate it if that smirk weren't in the image, though. Kleuske (talk) 22:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Made me laugh :) But identifiable person is an issue to me (unless he gave his consent for being published on Commons) - Benh (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- His expression clearly says that he has no problem. The only issue for me is the similarity of the clam and the spray probably made you laugh.
-- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- His expression clearly says that he has no problem. The only issue for me is the similarity of the clam and the spray probably made you laugh.
- Oppose Not convincing for featurable. --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
