Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palaeopropithecus ingens.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Palaeopropithecus ingens.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2010 at 22:38:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Smokeybjb - uploaded by Smokeybjb - nominated by Totodu74 -- Totodu74 (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Totodu74 (talk) 22:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)- Support Nice! --Citron (talk) 15:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support in spite of the bottom's tight crop--Mbz1 (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Looks promising in preview size, but not it in higher resolution. It lacks a sense of depth, there are some artificial looking (yeah, I know it is a reconstruction) transitions in the image, like in between the hand and the tree, where the texture of the tree is completely smoothed out as, whereas the arm and hand have much more detailed texture yet being at the same depth in the image. --Slaunger (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Sorry, but it looks to artificial to me (especially the hand). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Slaunger. Is it a scientific reason for the orange eyes, or is it only the choice of the artist ? It is very disturbing IMO because it catches the attention too much.--Jebulon (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Per opposers on top. Mulazimoglu (talk) 16:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Wertuose (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose for tight crop bottom left and distracting eyes. I also wonder why the right elbow is narrower than the arm above and below it, but the left elbow is not. --Avenue (talk) 09:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
