Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pérignac 16 Sablière D10 2013.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pérignac 16 Sablière D10 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2013 at 08:19:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by JLPC -- JLPC (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Support -- JLPC (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)- Support --Joydeep Talk 17:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support - Beau panorama. --Paul Munhoven (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Oppose no wow factor. Flickrworker (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)- Support yes, it's not wow but it's nice and educative valued is a good substitute to the wow factor --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose "Sand pit"? "wow"? --Kikos (talk) 07:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- And why not ?!? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sand pit have not the good status to be featured ?!? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- This page is for the featured images candidate, not featured subjects candidate --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Don't worry, Christian : this is a joke. As old as photography, as old as painting. If it wasn't many questions could be asked about such a review. --JLPC (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- This page is for the featured images candidate, not featured subjects candidate --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sand pit have not the good status to be featured ?!? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- And why not ?!? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose now wow, not really sharp (low details). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's true that the quality is a bit low, especialy for a subject that don't have the "wow statut" --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Uninteresting composition. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
