Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orgel-Klosterkirche-Saarn.jpg

File:Orgel-Klosterkirche-Saarn.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2013 at 13:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Orgel-Klosterkirche-Saarn.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orgel-Klosterkirche-Saarn.jpg

•  Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the blown area at the very left, and the darkish lower part. Btw, an example of a really wow photo of a church organ: [1]... --A.Savin 14:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  •  Info Probably the filename is a bit confusing. The idea was not to show a general Wow piture of an organ (for sure there are organs which are much more interesting as the example given by you), but the motive is the interior of the church (Abbey of Saarn) plus the organ. I personally like the high level of details (look at the small pictures painted by children) and the high dynamic range showing even details of the church's pews. The pictures are IMHO not comparable because they show very different motives.
    

BTW: The issue of overblown parts was discussed in detail on QIC and consensually corrected during the QI process. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

This particular FP was just an example of other existing FP of church interiors. In FPC, quality issues may be evaluated more critically than in QI. And there are some, so just accept my opinion like I'm going to accept anyone's support --A.Savin 15:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

• The window light made some damages on the organ too. Many reflections on the golden and silver parts. JKadavoor Jee 16:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)