Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2006.jpg

File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2006.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2012 at 22:16:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2006.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2006.jpg

•  Info created by Zentsik - uploaded by Zentsik - nominated by WikedKentaur -- WikedKentaur (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- WikedKentaur (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 08:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. --Llorenzi (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning atmosphere. With it, some minor technical flaws are forgiveable. - A.Savin 11:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Info I reduced noise level on the sky and fixed minor CA. --Ivar (talk) 11:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Vamps (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of the vignetting. Could be sharper, too, very nice atmosphere though. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Need not always be harsh on technicalities :). Its just a very good photo with mood. --Dey.sandip (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the vignetting is just too strong, though the light is good. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose, pro if vignetting is corrected (should be possible). --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Vignetting ruins the picture. Yann (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose the vignetting is really too strong on this picture (is due to low light, lens or artificial effect ?) --PierreSelim (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Pretty good, but not enough "wow" factor for me. Michael Barera (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 10:40, 28 November 2012 (UTC)