Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NYC Panorama edit2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:NYC Panorama edit2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2010 at 23:06:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info photographed by Jnn13 - stitched by LiveChocolate - nominated by LiveChocolate -- LiveChocolate (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Support -- LiveChocolate (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)- Support Incredibly detailed. I like to be pedantic and I have carefully scrutinized the photo for defects. The only thing I found was a very slightly non-vertical antenna on top of one building (see annotation). And then, in full resolution, the trees along the cityline to the water looks "washed out". However, this is not due to the stitching as it is also there in the original. Do not know why they look like that considering the high end equipment used for the individual photos. Outstanding(?) visibility on the day, very well stitched and good light as well. A pity that the 13.6:1 aspect ratio of the skyline is as extreme as it is, as you really need a very wide and high resolution monitor to fully appreciate it in its entirety. --Slaunger (talk) 23:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Thank you! --MattiPaavola (talk) 23:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great, thanks for putting it on commons! Nikopol (talk) 00:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent and detailed. No major flaws or stitching errors. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Really fascinating and well done. Greets from Mecklenburg, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent work. --Cayambe (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Patriot8790 (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Done Wow, Böhringer, how did you see that one?! you are great. LiveChocolate (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXX talk 13:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
WTF?!! I wish I could take pictures like this...wow, great detail...strongly Support. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 05:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)- Support I ♥ NY --Phyrexian (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you all :) , I wish photographer of this image was also active to see this. LiveChocolate (talk) 22:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Very nice work. Tiptoety talk 07:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great ! --Jivee Blau (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Neutral Although it's indeed an interesting panorama, everything south of the Empire State Building is either not very impressive (no high-rise buildings), or too far to be truly appreciated with the current image resolution (Financial District). --S23678 (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)- Support--Avala (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for stitching. It was a very, very cold, clear day! I like how you can see where the sun hits the buildings directly (on the left side) and where the buildings are in shadow (on the right). Sun is very low on the horizon in winter, setting behind and to my right. Antenna may be non-vertical because of very strong winds that day!! Jnn13 (talk) 01:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Impressive panorama, I think it has the potential to become a classic. PS: I added an image note on the far right of the picture, which might go unnoticed, being so far outside the usual span... Is it a dust spot, and if so, would it be possible to fix it? Thanks in advance. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas
