Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NYC CentralStation amk.jpg

File:NYC CentralStation amk.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2009 at 22:21:17

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by AngMoKio -- AngMoKio (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Info View on the busy central station in New York City. --AngMoKio (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- AngMoKio (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow. —kallerna™ 14:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, it has unsuitable composition, noise, wobbly perspective, lack of "wow" factor. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

unsuitable composition?! wobbly perspective?! Could you elaborate on those topics? I don't really know what you mean by this. You are aware that this picture was meant to be a longtime exposure (relative to the conditions) photo. --AngMoKio (talk) 15:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, it seems that others think that I am wrong. Consider me in opposition, though. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Support - Just to eliminate the FPX thing, which seems poorly applied. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 04:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I cannot help disliking the overexposed central window and the central bluish area in the hall. --Cayambe (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think I've seen a far better picture by Diliff, here, which could be nominated instead - Benh (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I like the motion effect in this picture. I do not know why, but I just do.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment The long time exposure is the main positive here - good idea, and it solves the identifiable person problem as well as giving an impression of activity which creates a "story-line". But I think it should not have been taken on the centre-line, which is why I rejected a dead-centre version of Wrockwardine Church in favour of this off-centre version. Plus there are some lens colour fringes, which would be reduced with a smaller lens aperture. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 01:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Karel (talk) 10:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)