Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Multi plate pipe installation.jpg

File:Multi plate pipe installation.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2015 at 23:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Multi plate pipe installation.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Multi plate pipe installation.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great idea and suitable wow, but the image is too noisy for me. Reworkable from RAW? --Kreuzschnabel 15:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment It is how it is... ;-) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose then, for technical shortcomings. Pity. --Kreuzschnabel 09:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support maybe but eye catching -- Christian Ferrer 21:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Per Kreuzschnabel and also some CA, because a correct processing software was used but no technical or artistic reason given. Sting (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment It is a photograph of a metal pipe installation. ;) and what does "but no technical or artistic reason given" mean? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Yep, sorry, missing part: "...but no technical or artistic reason given for keeping the noise." Because you "explained" this point to Kreuzschnabel with a laconic "It is how it is..." Sting (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

- Ok, I´ll explain... pic taken at f8, why? needed dof. pic taken at 1/30 that corresponded to least hand held exposure by me, and fast enough to sort of not have moving people... so iso 1,600 was the corresponding setting in order to use such settings, thinking in the photo scene... if I reduced iso, longer exporuse time would result which I could not do without tripod... the range was large and large areas in deep shadow which are bound to be noisy, tunnels are dark by nature, and noise amid lots of texture and rythm don´t bother me too much, I wanted the general effect and one has to sacrifice some things. I did some adjustment, but after a while image becames unreal. I push it to just this side of normal or acceptable. Contrary to popular beliefs and expectations, neither noise nor grain are necessarily bad things, in fact, they can be good too. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /KTC (talk) 20:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)