Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mullus surmuletus.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mullus surmuletus.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2010 at 18:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by and uploaded by Hans Hillewaert - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- This fish is delicious (and very expensive). But the lighting is not good enough, with extensive overexposed areas. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Too bad about the blown areas. I going to withdraw. However, before I do, can you please tell me what is unsatisfactory about the lighting? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please don't withdraw, that is just my opinion, I'm not sure what went wrong with the lighting, those with parts look like specular reflections from the light source. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Too bad about the blown areas. I going to withdraw. However, before I do, can you please tell me what is unsatisfactory about the lighting? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral High technical level and good colors. Light acceptable IMO. Valuable, but rather conventional composition. --Slaunger (talk) 22:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose --Overexposed at some places. Bjoertvedt (talk) 22:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)