Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mug Humboldt HBP 2011-12-22.jpg

File:Mug Humboldt HBP 2011-12-22.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2012 at 21:52:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mug Humboldt HBP 2011-12-22.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mug Humboldt HBP 2011-12-22.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Grand-Duc -- Grand-Duc (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Abstain as photographer. -- Grand-Duc (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Question Wov? Why?--Miguel Bugallo 02:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support purposive depth of field Cathy Richards (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Question Copyright ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special. Poor DOF (f5)--Miguel Bugallo 04:49, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I usually don't use the no-wow argument, but in this case, this is a very common, easy to take image. Crop is tight on the bottom and background is distracting. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor photo quality. --Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 20:09, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor photo, not special. –ElmA (Talk – My files) 14:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Claritas (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)