Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morcote Ticino.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Morcote Ticino.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2010 at 17:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by murdockcrc - uploaded by murdockcrc - nominated by murdockcrc -- Murdockcrc (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Murdockcrc (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose -- Bad quality. Mulazimoglu (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Would you please elaborate? --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well. The image is not clear. The island is just in the center. Colors are not that good. And a lot i cant tell in English. It looks like a nice place though. Mulazimoglu (talk) 11:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Neutral -- Great view, magnificent location, view point well chosen. I would support with a better image quality (sharpness, colors), and if it would be a wider panorama showing the edges of the water (where does that bridge lead to?). -- Onno Zweers (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your input. Composition-wise, there is nothing much to be done. As you can see, there's a forest to the right, so increasing the perspective in that direction will not show anything but trees. To the left, there is a hotel, so no chance of seeing more of the water. As far as colors and sharpness go, there's nothing more I can do about them... --Murdockcrc (talk) 15:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose the setting is very interesting and seems worthy to be featured. contrasts, sharpness, focus, colours - pretty much anything could be better. a great shot with insufficient technical quality to be featured by me. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 23:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose plus the grass looks like a frame. Either more in or out. Tanakashi (talk)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
