Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montreal Skyline from Mont Royal.jpg

File:Montreal Skyline from Mont Royal.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2019 at 01:04:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Montreal Skyline from Mont Royal.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montreal Skyline from Mont Royal.jpg

15405

2259

452

594

25603

4755

Leonard Cohen Mural

19969

4612

594

119

25603

4755

Can you fix this?

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
•  Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 01:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Some noise in the trees, and a small white unstitched area on the lower right third. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done King of thanks for the review. Ikan Kekek, Cmao20 --Wilfredor (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

 Support now. A smaller aperture could have given more depth of field, but I'm not too bothered by a little unsharpness in the foreground vegetation. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support but per KoH, see note --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I'm holding off for now, per KoH. Please fix the white area at the bottom margin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Not perfect (noise in trees) but phenomenal resolution and overall very good quality. I will support as soon as the white area at the bottom is fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Resolution is great, but we already have a bunch of FPs from this view (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) and the lighting of the existing FPs is mostly more interesting (or by night, which is more spectacular IMHO). Poco² 19:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

  This would be the highest-resolution FP of them all, so I think this does offer something new to the table. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:48, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

• Wilfredor, I'm answering the comment you inserted in this FPC and later, for whatever reason and without mentioning anywhere, deleted. This user is not worried about delits, specially if you delist the image you linked (which was yours :). If you meant this FP, I indeed like the lighting there much more than here, those clouds add an interesting element in the compo IMHO. If your threat to delist an FP is your argument to defend this FP then that's a poor one.
• KoH: That higher resolution is such an argument that compensates lighting or compo vs already existing FPs was not really clear to me, I'll nominate some candidates following that rule. Poco² 08:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Poc ese mensaje lo borre porque no era lo que yo queria decir, si ves todo lo que cambio ese mensaje en el historial te daras cuenta. Abrazos --Wilfredor (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Based on KoH’s reasoning, it’s not my favourite of the panoramas Poco links to, but it is the highest resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 11:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 18:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:21, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great work. But please Wilfredor can you fix the bottom? There are quite visible marks from copyediting. I put a note there. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Podzemnik thanks its gone --Wilfredor (talk) 12:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Alt version

•  Info I think this version is higher resolution. Ikan Kekek, Martin Falbisoner, Johann Jaritz, Yann, Tournasol7, Famberhorst, Llez, Booth, King of, Poc --Wilfredor (talk) 23:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment WB is a bit green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

King of, thanks you was right, I rebuild fromm the original colors and using a selective WB. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Impressive resolution! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The contrast is better above. Yann (talk) 07:53, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Yann I added a selective contrast and curve adjustement. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

 Support OK, good. Now these are quite similar, so you should choose one of these, and withdraw the other one. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Yann I can withdraw the other nomination version and it could take the votes from the other? --Wilfredor (talk) 12:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

You can't take the votes, but you ask the voters to vote for this one instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support.--Vulphere 16:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I have uploaded a version that I consider superior so it is better to dismiss this nomination. Thank you very much for your recommendations --Wilfredor (talk) 18:15, 7 July 2019 (UTC)