Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Matsalu metsas.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Matsalu metsas.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2014 at 12:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Urmas83 - uploaded by Urmas83 - nominated by Urmas83 -- Urmas Haljaste (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Urmas Haljaste (talk) 12:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There in no perspective issue. The hut is actually crooked. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 12:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Strong support Awesome shot. Sharp, great colours and composition. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I like the atmosphere and image composition, on the other hand there are substantial blurred areas around the house (mainly in the tree regions).-- Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Excellent picture. Impressed with reed roof and forged parts. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition is ok but there are too much blurred areas in the trees -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment This blur is actually intentional and it the guidelines it is called "motion blur". the branches are moving in wind. If all the branches in the background were sharp there would not be enough contrast between the hut and the trees. I actually would prefer even more blurred background but it was quite windy and with longer exposure time I would have had some overall blurriness due to camera shake. I nominated this picture because I was encouraged by the success of another picture of mine also with large blurred areas that was unanimously elected to featured picture. --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The blur is also to make the hut stand out, or it would just blend in with the background if everything is equally sharp.
- Support (weak) I consider it an interesting approach to leave background blurred like that, but at the same time I am not so much convinced about the overall wow effect of this image. You have some really nice shoots from Matsalu, ones that I consider even better than this. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Jee 06:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 11:17, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 15:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture