Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marocaster coronatus MHNT.PAL.2010.2.2 (Close up).jpg

File:Marocaster coronatus MHNT.PAL.2010.2.2 (Close up).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2013 at 11:56:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Marocaster coronatus MHNT.PAL.2010.2.2 (Close up).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marocaster coronatus MHNT.PAL.2010.2.2 (Close up).jpg

•  Info created by Archaeodontosaurus - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Alborzagros -- Alborzagros (talk) 11:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 11:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Maire (talk) 12:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support-- Peter23 (talk) 14:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Jml3 (talk) 17:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice and different but sharpness is not the best, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality is not convincing. Sharpness and level of detail are very weak. IMHO something went wrong during processing. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality issues (sharpness). Not one of the finest on Commons., Category:Fossil Asteroidea contains better examples. To satisfy my own curiosity, why the rather long exposure (1/13th) at f/20? --NJR_ZA (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Ταπυροι (گپ) 11:54, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- As above. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose For Tuxyso and NJR ZA. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 16:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  SupportThe effect Wow, is not in the image quality. But the subject of the image. It is also necessary to read the caption. This is not a simpe starfish fossil. This is the holotype of the species is also one of the genus. This type of photography is normally reserved only pulications scientists. It is a great pleasure to be able to convince a curarator permetre you do this type of image. Try to reach the holotype, try to make images in the condition that you will be offered. My dream is to be able to see all holotypes in our encyclopedias. Thank you Alborzagros.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, but then valued image and not featured picture. It is from a photographic standpoint no excellent photo, sorry. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose High value, but not sharp enough, I'm afraid.--Jebulon (talk) 12:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)