Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Macizos de Tennen, Tenneck, Austria, 2019-05-18, DD 28-38 PAN.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2020 at 15:56:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Salzburg
- Info View from a trail in the Tennen Mountains towards the Berchtesgaden Alps, Austria. Note: this image is not distorted as you can see in the geodata. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support You weren't very lucky with the light, but the composition and detail are amazing. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Yes, a great composition. I'm not sure I understand the blue clouds, though. Should they be gray, or did they look blue? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek: I adjusted the WB, it was indeed a bit cold --Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - But what happened to the clouds that disappeared with your edit? Also, the blue mountains in the previous version were nice, though if they were actually gray, fine. Do you think you could recover some of the substance of the clouds (if that's what they were) that disappeared with your edit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support A very interesting composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Very bad light. Burnt sky, blown highlights, bland colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose light conditions were not favorable. --Ivar (talk) 04:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: having looked at the original version, I'd be more inclined to support it. The sky was partially overexposed, but borderline acceptable for a FP. Now, it's mostly burnt, with strong posterization. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose A bit surprised with those who oppose a fisheye shot and support this one. This is more misleading a projection in my opinion. Not careful people will think the two roads are parallel. They aren't. I think there is material for a better projection. The view is very nice (but yes, the lighting could be better; and the exposures on the source photos seem not consistent). - Benh (talk) 17:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Yann (talk) 07:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose A place with lots of potential for FP, but this is not it. --El Grafo (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results: