Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2014 -- 0323.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom -- 2014 -- 0323.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2014 at 13:35:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 13:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Support -- XRay talk 13:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose This photo appears for me to be 
Overprocessed and does not appear to be a faithful representation of the subject. --Slaunger (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment Just an information: The light of the illumination was yellow (-> Sodium-vapor lamp) during the blue hour. There are no special improvements of the lights.--XRay talk 05:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- @XRay: Thanks for the information. To clarify my oppose, it is not the color balance I am having an issue with. It is the color saturation, which I find excessive. Sure you have not given it a big nudge up on the color saturation knob? --Slaunger (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Slaunger: Thanks for your advice. I just checked it. I'm using LR and both dynamic and saturation is "0". So there is no additional saturation.--XRay talk 10:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- @XRay: Given that statement, I redact my oppose. Thanks for checking. --Slaunger (talk) 10:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support Pretty typical of what night architecture photos look like. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support ok for me: a typical local night view. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The saturation might not be increased but this long exposure has resulted in an image different to what the eye sees. That's not necessary a bad thing, but I don't much like the orange/blue mix. The left tower has what I can only describe as smudged bits all over it. I have no idea how they occur but it isn't appealing. The right hand side is hidden by a tree (take chainsaw next time you visit :-). I appreciate the effort involved, but I don't think the result is FP. -- Colin (talk) 21:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Colin: IMO the colours are OK. Just for your information: It's the special light that looks orange. The left tower shows the shadows of some of the trees of the square. (There are a lot of trees on the square.)--XRay talk 06:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I appreciate that you have no control over the orange colour or the consistency of lights or trees. But a great picture is a combination of what's there and what the photographer has done with it. -- Colin (talk) 08:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Jebulon (talk) 10:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
